Buy on Amazon
$59.34
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than FX-6200 - 118 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - $42.85 vs $59.34
- Up to 22% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-7500T - $0.39 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for $59.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
