Buy on Amazon
$78.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $621
Availability
MSRP in USD: $621
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 197 days older than the more expensive Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-7400T - 526 vs 521 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $45.93 vs $78.02
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Hexa-core (6 Core) 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3
Buy for $45.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
86.1864406779661%
Multi-Core
2806
51.2043795620438%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
