Buy on Amazon
$75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1620 - 100 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77651 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
40.21632251720747%
Multi-Core
723
25.766215253029223%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
