Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 932 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 11% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1820 - 137 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 97% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $39.59 vs $1425.0
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
41.610169491525426%
Multi-Core
825
15.054744525547445%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |