Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2185 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $46.41 vs $1555.0
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than Celeron G1820 - 62 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 64 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77612 minutes ago
Buy for $1,555 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77613 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.012224938875303%
Multi-Core
825
5.889491719017704%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |