Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2417 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $46.41 vs $944.95
- Up to 92% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.31 vs $3.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 60% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1820 - 240 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
150
62%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.94/FPS
7%
Price, $
$944.95
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for $944.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |