Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2148 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $46.41 vs $780.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10940X - $0.36 vs $5.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1820 - 137 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 28 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
128
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for $780 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |