Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3321 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $46.41 vs $899.99
- Up to 94% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13400F - $0.4 vs $6.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 25% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1820 - 146 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
117
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |