Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $46.41 vs $739.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.93 vs $8.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 53 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 82% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1820 - 91 vs 50 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 48 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
50
54%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.12/FPS
11%
Price, $
$739
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |