Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 418 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 170 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $221.76 vs $1150.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $1.34 vs $6.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 180 vs 250 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.76/FPS
19%
Price, $
$1150
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12938 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12938 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Colfax | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |