Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1555 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $1150.0 vs $1399.99
- Up to 8% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-13700F - $5.69 vs $6.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 226 vs 202 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
202
89%
Value, $/FPS
$5.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.19/FPS
91%
Price, $
$1399.99
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
250 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |