Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1608 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $221.76 vs $899.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400F - $1.23 vs $4.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 204 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
27%
Price, $
$899.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |