Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700KF - 659 vs 595 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $208.99 vs $899.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12400F - $0.35 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
659
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
25%
Price, $
$899.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3929 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
595
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3930 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |