Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1356 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 2700X - 217 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $210.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-12400F - $1.04 vs $4.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.15/FPS
25%
Price, $
$899.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6517 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
202
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |