Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3321 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $46.41 vs $448.88
- Up to 87% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.39 vs $2.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 53 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1820 - 155 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10334 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.9/FPS
13%
Price, $
$448.88
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $448.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |