Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1767 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $46.41 vs $197.65
- Up to 73% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.38 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1820 - 139 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
123
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15958 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
26%
Price, $
$197.65
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15959 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |