Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1600 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $46.41 vs $210.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.21 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1820 - 244 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8279 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8280 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |