Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 551 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930T - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-6600 - $39.0 vs $79.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-6600 - $0.27 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13682 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13681 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |