Buy on Amazon
$79
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $213
Availability
MSRP in USD: $213
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 669 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 5% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i7-4930K - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - $79.0 vs $98.0
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 12 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Boxed Core I5-6600 FC-LGA14C 3.30 Ghz 6 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I56600
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4930K Processor - BX80633I74930K
Buy for $98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-6600
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Core i7-4930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
662
51.47744945567651%
Multi-Core
3336
93.91891891891892%
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
