Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670S outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670S is 1114 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 1% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 136 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $55.26 vs $232.12
- Up to 76% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.41 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2218 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
135
99.26470588235294%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
23.83720930232558%
Price, $
$232.12
23%
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |