Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $95.0 vs $189.95
- Up to 46% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.5 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-3450S - 205 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 24 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
53%
Price, $
$189.95
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |