Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $86.0 vs $189.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-11600K - $0.73 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-3450S - 144 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
118
81.94444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
55.72519083969465%
Price, $
$189
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
26.715462031107045%
Multi-Core
1681
19.59435831682014%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |