Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $86.0 vs $97.2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 34% better in War Thunder than Core i5-3450S - 182 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 12 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 327 minutes ago
Buy for $97.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
40.61196105702364%
Multi-Core
1681
29.229699182750824%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |