Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 23% better in New World than Core i7-4770 - 135 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $74.95 vs $179.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing New World than Core i5-11600K - $0.68 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
51%
Price, $
$179.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
110
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |