Buy on Amazon
$175
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-7500T - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $56.68 vs $175.0
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74565 minutes ago
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for $56.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74566 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
50.777676120768525%
Multi-Core
3076
35.85499475463341%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
