Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 23% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-4130 - 144 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $22.92 vs $179.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-11600K - $0.2 vs $1.25 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
16%
Price, $
$179.99
12%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14408 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
