Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 235 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $78.02 vs $179.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11600K - $0.39 vs $0.77 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
50%
Price, $
$179.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
202
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |