Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Celeron G6900 - 871 vs 798 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $59.99 vs $179.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-11600K - $0.08 vs $0.21 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
871
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
38%
Price, $
$179.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
798
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |