Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1464 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than Core i7-8700 - 90 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $59.99 vs $200.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-8700 - $0.67 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14145 minutes ago
Buy for $200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |