Buy on Amazon
$74.79
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1189 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $74.79 vs $189.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.6 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G6900 Dual-core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
