Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1356 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 2600 - 204 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $74.79 vs $140.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.37 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |