Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $59.99 vs $260.91
- Up to 73% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-11700F - $0.08 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Celeron G6900 - 860 vs 798 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
798
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13374 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
860
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
26%
Price, $
$260.91
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |