Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $59.99 vs $179.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11600K - $0.35 vs $1.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G6900 - 180 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
170
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14357 minutes ago
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |