Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 5 5600

Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 5 5600: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Celeron G6900

3.4 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)

Buy for $59.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13316 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

3.5 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler

Buy for $139.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13316 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G6900

3.4 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)

Buy for $59.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13316 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

3.5 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler

Buy for $139.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13316 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900

  • Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $59.99 vs $139.99
  • Up to 57% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 5 5600 - $0.37 vs $0.86 per FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600

  • Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G6900 - 163 vs 160 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Red Dead Redemption 2.
Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


FPS

160

98%

Value, $/FPS

$0.37/FPS

100%

Price, $

$59.99

100%

Value Winner

CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)

Buy for $59.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13316 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Logo
Ryzen 5 5600

Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022


FPS

163

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.86/FPS

43%

Price, $

$139.99

42%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler

Buy for $139.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13316 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Logo
Ryzen 5 5600

Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo
Celeron G6900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022


Single-Core

1603

79%

Multi-Core

2696

31%

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Logo
Ryzen 5 5600

Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022


Single-Core

2029

100%

Multi-Core

8539

100%

Intel Celeron G6900 Logo

Intel Celeron G6900

vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

Jan 4th, 2022Release Date
Apr 20th, 2022
CeleronCollectionRyzen 5
Alder LakeCodenameVermeer
Intel Socket 1700SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
6
2Threads
12
3.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.4 GHz
Not AvailableTDP65 W
10 nmProcess Size
7 nm
34.0xMultiplier
35.0x
UHD Graphics 710
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Celeron G6900 or Ryzen 5 5600

Red Dead Redemption 2, 1920 x 1080, Highest

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.