Buy on Amazon
$216.25
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-4300 - 288 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $48.02 vs $216.25
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i5-14400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $216.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75204 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-14400
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-14400 or FX-4300
F1 22, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
135 FPS
$13.98/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i5-14400
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,887.79
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
