Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - 571 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $37.0 vs $229.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-14400 - $0.07 vs $0.4 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |