Buy on Amazon
$216.25
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 5235 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-750 - 256 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $60.0 vs $216.25
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-14400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $216.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75205 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-14400
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-14400 or Core i5-750
Battlefield 1, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
153 FPS
$12.34/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i5-14400
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,887.79
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
