Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 147 vs 134 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $197.65 vs $268.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13600K - $1.48 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600K - 24 vs 20 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
80%
Price, $
$268.99
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15328 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
134
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15328 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |