Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 1786 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 214 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
181
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |