Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 128 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $100.0 vs $115.99
- Up to 1% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11400F - $0.9 vs $0.91 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
98%
Price, $
$115.99
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |