Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4360 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1616 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $149.88 vs $188.95
- Up to 20% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.88 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-4360 - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 24 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
170
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
80%
Price, $
$188.95
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |