Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2899 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i3-380M - 199 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |