Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 3474 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-380M - 134 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |