Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 3101 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-380M - 228 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$250.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $250.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |