Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3474 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-380M - 432 vs 365 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
432
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |