Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 606 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8150 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than FX-8150 - $48.0 vs $82.02
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74519 minutes ago
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74520 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |