Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2645 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $64.03 vs $101.79
- Up to 33% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i5-9400F - $0.14 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 8% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8150 - 487 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |