Buy on Amazon
$64.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $64.03 vs $99.9
- Up to 28% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-6700T - $0.29 vs $0.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 12% better in Lost Ark than FX-8150 - 249 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17842 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
