Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $64.03 vs $84.99
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 33% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8150 - 185 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.99
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |