Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $64.03 vs $122.03
- Up to 41% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-3770 - $0.44 vs $0.74 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 23 than FX-8150 - 164 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |